KSN are proud to support:

Kent facing yet another defeat
Kent facing yet another defeat

Nottinghamshire put themselves in a position to dictate the terms of the final day as openers Ben Slater and Haseeb Hameed built on a small first-innings lead to leave their side 210 in front with nine wickets in hand at the close of day three of their LV= Insurance County Championship match against Kent.

The pair shared a partnership of 131 – Nottingham’s best this season for the first wicket – before Hameed was out for 45 six overs before the close. Slater’s unbeaten 87 leaves him 13 runs away from a second hundred in the match, with Will Young on 32 from just 19 balls as Nottinghamshire finished on 176 for one.

Earlier, although there were solid performances from Harry Finch (73) and Joey Evison (49), Kent ultimately squandered what looked to be a good position in reply to Nottinghamshire’s first-innings 350 by losing their last five wickets for 23 to be 316 all out.

Leg-spinner Calvin Harrison finished with a career-best four for 28 – albeit in only his seventh first-class match – and Brett Hutton kept his nose in front as Division One’s leading wicket-taker with three for 76, despite Jamie Porter taking 10 in the match for Essex against Hampshire.

Kent, whose relegation worries have increased with Middlesex’s win at Edgbaston, had been well placed at 102 for two when rain forced them off at tea on Wednesday, but their morning began badly when Ben Geddes, the loanee from Surrey who had played well for his 36, was out in the second over, caught by Harrison at second slip chasing a widish ball from Hutton that found some extra bounce.

A recovery followed. After hours of rain through the previous evening, Nottinghamshire might have anticipated a period of renewed liveliness from a pitch that had given the seamers plenty of encouragement over the first two days but neither Hutton nor Dane Paterson could control the scoreboard in their opening spells.

Finch and Jack Leaning settled in nicely and it took a strange dismissal shortly before lunch to deny the fourth-wicket pair a substantial partnership.

It came after Harrison entered the attack for the first time and a disbelieving Leaning was out to his second ball, getting a thin edge that then freakishly ballooned high into the air, apparently off the top of wicketkeeper Tom Moores’s right pad. It flew over the head of Mullaney at slip but the Nottinghamshire skipper had time to catch it on its way down.

Nonetheless, breakthroughs were rare as Kent, for all their injury woes, steadily eroded the advantage Nottinghamshire had seemed to have established with what looked like a good score on a relatively hazardous pitch.  

Kent’s assessment at Wednesday’s close that 350 might be a par score had seemed like wishful thinking but Nottinghamshire, missing Luke Fletcher from their attack after he limped off the field on day two, found it difficult to create many opportunities.

Alex Blake, in his first red-ball innings for four years, fell to the fifth delivery with the second new ball as Hutton raised his tally for the season to 48 – his best return in a first-class season – but as Finch and Evison added 75 in 18 overs it seemed Kent’s confidence had not been misplaced after all.

Yet after Paterson, having bowled 17 unsuccessful overs from the pavilion end, switched to the Radcliffe Road end and Harrison returned for a second spell, everything changed rapidly.

First Finch, who had gone past fifty for the third time in as many matches since Kent’s injury crisis opened up a place in the senior side, made a rare misjudgement and paid the price, offering no shot as Paterson brought one back to clip his off stump.

The South African followed up by bowling Evison in his next over with another nip-backer,  good enough to do the job even though Evison did attempt to keep it out.

Harrison then coaxed a miscue to deep extra cover from Matt Quinn and from 293 for five, Kent were suddenly 308 for eight.  A couple of overs more and they were all out and conceding a 34-run deficit, the leg-spinner finishing the innings with two in two balls as Arshdeep holed out to deep midwicket and Arafat Bhuiyan offered him a rigid front pad.

By the evening, largely played out in sunshine, the pitch looked to have settled down and Slater and Hameed exposed the limitations of the Kent attack, which lacks a front-line spinner, proceeding largely untroubled, certainly in terms of chances offered, through almost 35 overs before Hameed aimed an injudicious slash at a shortish wide delivery from Arshdeep Singh and was caught behind.

Kent’s over-rate was pedestrian and could yet do them damage at a stage in the season when bonus points become critical. They have a chance to improve things on day four but as things stand they are at minus three. If that were to translate to points docked, even a draw here would leave them in the relegation places.

Nottinghamshire’s Calvin Harrison said:

“The top order have done a great job and hopefully they can carry on and set up a score that we can defend tomorrow.

“The bowlers stood up very well considering we were a bowler light but it is a situation we have come up against a few times this season when guys have been injured during the game.

“The likes of Lyndon and Brett and Dane had to pick up a few extra overs. It is good to be able to hold one end and give the seamers a chance to attack at the other end and that was the job for me and Steven Mullaney

“It was after Dane switched ends that things began to happen. To get Finch and Evison in quick succession was important.

“I didn’t know it was a career best, it is just good to get wickets. The first one was a bit unusual. I didn’t see it that clearly myself but I think it hit Tom (Moores) on the knee and looped up to Mull at second slip. For the last three, they were looking to be aggressive and that worked in my favour.

“Hopefully, if we can start well tomorrow, if we can get to a 350-plus lead and leave them 70 overs, I think five-an-over would make it a good chase.”

Kent’s Harry Finch said:

“We were a bit disappointed with how the day ended. Had we managed to get a few wickets it would have made it interesting. That didn’t happen but we’ll see what we can do in the morning.

“The pitch is still doing a bit if you bowl it in the right areas but as a group we didn’t do that consistently enough.

“Our batting – I got 70-odd when I really should have gone on to get 100 and a few of the other guys got 30s and 40s. A few more pushes us up past them. I don’t think it was a 350 pitch, to be honest. They probably got 100 over par so it was a pretty good effort from us really.

“I’ve been pleased with how it has gone for me back in the side, although I think more about doing something to put us in a good place as a team than what I do for myself. I just try to play the situation as it comes.

“It is obviously a team with a lot of players missing. I would be lying to say we weren’t a bit disappointed at the end. It was a pitch where we could have had them 80 for five on another day, but we can’t be too hard on ourselves.

“We had a couple of young guys making their debuts in the batting and some of our bowlers don’t have a lot of experience yet, so we can’t be too harsh on ourselves.”



 
Seo